NS8-App Mayhem: A Modules Dev thread on multiple modules issues faced

I have embarked on a Journey that started well, but the going keeps getting tougher by the day.

Your Repositories (github.com)

Here is a List of Modules I have been working on, both as a way to sharpen my module development skills, and also as a way to contribute to NS8 modules.

My hope was that by the time NS8 gets to release, I would have these modules up and running, but mahn, have i entered a rabbit hole.

Paperless NGX = Completed and production ready(Published)
JoplinServer = Completed-released
n8n = Completed-Released
MAtomo = Completed-Released

StirlingPDF = Completed-Released
GLPi = Completed-Released
Dolibarr = Completed-Released
IT-Tools = Completed-Released
Calibre-Web = Completed-testing
Calibre = Completed-testing
Homarr = Completed-testing
goauthentik = Completed-testing

NTFY = Completed-WIP(more to be done)
Linkwarden = WIP
VAultwarden - WIP
Coder = WIP
SurrealDB = WIP
SocFortress Copilot(not AI related)= WIP
TActicalRMM = not yet began
2FAUTH = not yet began
MAtrix = Not sure where to begin
Zammad = not yet began @mrmarkuz take it up

Would love to have teleport as well, https://goteleport.com/ but whoosh…

So i have created this, to simplify and collect into one, some of challenges i am facing, and potential resolution to some of the issues being faced (Not sure if its the right course of Action) I could probably Open individual threads for each module, I am open to sugegstion.

At the moment been trying to implement a single service module, and i seem to be doing something wrong.

Could a Dev kindly nudge me in the right direction.

What could be wrong with this service file here:

ns8-vaultwarden/imageroot/systemd/user/vaultwarden.service at main · compgeniuses/ns8-vaultwarden (github.com)


removed: not necessary for this thread

one task at a time

hello @stephdl true to the point, unfortunately my brain just doesnt know how to compute complex things one at a time.

Now, doing multiple modules at the same time has actually helped alot, each of the different modules had different caveats to solve and handle, and each was a learning point for the other or next modules being built.

Also, when one modules starts to misbehave, instead of wasting time trying to figure the problem, i jump to the next module in the queue, which might or might not have the same or different set of challenges.

Overall i am abit confident in the noamrl modules building, its the complex ones, i am looking forward to figuring out,

the ones that combine UDP and TCP ports, that require compiling own docker image from source, and other advance stuff, though learning one module at a time…

Welcome back how was fosdem?

amazing times with mates

most of time the error is specific to the module, I need time to fix something broken and jump to break other things has never helped me.

I have since made significant Milestone on the VAultwarden as well as the Go authentic module.

for Authentik, i am getting a weird error i am unsure the origins from

<7>dump_env() is deprecated and implemented as a no-op
<7>dump_env() is deprecated and implemented as a no-op
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/home/goauthentik4/.config/actions/configure-module/40request-LE-certificate.py", line 19, in <module>
  File "/usr/local/agent/pypkg/agent/tasks/run.py", line 45, in run_nowait
    return run(agent_id, action, data, nowait=True, **kwargs)
  File "/usr/local/agent/pypkg/agent/tasks/run.py", line 39, in run
    results = runp([taskrq], **kwargs)
  File "/usr/local/agent/pypkg/agent/tasks/run.py", line 50, in runp
    return asyncio.run(_runp(tasks, **kwargs))
  File "/usr/lib64/python3.11/asyncio/runners.py", line 190, in run
    return runner.run(main)
  File "/usr/lib64/python3.11/asyncio/runners.py", line 118, in run
    return self._loop.run_until_complete(task)
  File "/usr/lib64/python3.11/asyncio/base_events.py", line 653, in run_until_complete
    return future.result()
  File "/usr/local/agent/pypkg/agent/tasks/run.py", line 120, in _runp
    return await asyncio.gather(*runners, return_exceptions=(len(tasks) > 1))
  File "/usr/local/agent/pypkg/agent/tasks/run.py", line 136, in _run_with_protocol_nowait
    return await run_apiclient_nowait(taskrq, **pconn)
  File "/usr/local/agent/pypkg/agent/tasks/apiclient.py", line 35, in run_apiclient_nowait
    return await _retry_request(_apost_task, taskrq, client=client, theaders=theaders, **kwargs)
  File "/usr/local/agent/pypkg/agent/tasks/apiclient.py", line 191, in _retry_request
    raise exhttp
  File "/usr/local/agent/pypkg/agent/tasks/apiclient.py", line 166, in _retry_request
    retval = await request_procedure(*args, **kwargs)
  File "/usr/local/agent/pypkg/agent/tasks/apiclient.py", line 246, in _apost_task
    async with client.post(
  File "/usr/local/agent/pyenv/lib64/python3.11/site-packages/aiohttp/client.py", line 1141, in __aenter__
    self._resp = await self._coro
  File "/usr/local/agent/pyenv/lib64/python3.11/site-packages/aiohttp/client.py", line 643, in _request
  File "/usr/local/agent/pyenv/lib64/python3.11/site-packages/aiohttp/client_reqrep.py", line 1005, in raise_for_status
    raise ClientResponseError(
aiohttp.client_exceptions.ClientResponseError: 403, message='Forbidden', url=URL('http://cluster-leader:9311/api/module/traefik1/tasks')

Before this error, All containrs in the pod were running, but i could not reach them from the browser.

to test the authentik issue:

add-module ghcr.io/compgeniuses/goauthentik:certgen 1

All other commits before trying to implement certificate generation are here:

add-module ghcr.io/compgeniuses/goauthentik:latest1

you are not allowed to use traefik look your buildscript

1 Like

I am not allowed to use traefik? WHat does that mean?

by the build script do you mean build-images.sh file?

yes exactly

from the looks of things, i see that everything is fine, Unless there is something i am no seeing.
IF you’ve spotted something could you point me to where the problem is and possibly how to resolve it?

EDIT, seen the issue

Would modifyign to this resolve the issue:
--label="org.nethserver.authorizations=traefik@node:certadm node:fwadm cluster:accountconsumer" \

or should it be:
--label="org.nethserver.authorizations=traefik@node:fulladm node:fwadm cluster:accountconsumer" \

i don’t know what you want to do, so no clue

cluster:accountconsumer is for ldap
node:fwadm is for to open port in firewall
traefik@node:fulladm open route, full admin
traefik@node:certadm admin only to create certificate inside traefik

Note yet added ldap integration yet, it will be added Eventually.
I need to create certificate of course.

WOuld fulladm also have certadm functions as well?

1 Like

I think so

All this authorizations part is not well documented but good developers never read documentation, they always read the code of others developers who have read the documentation

Happy to Announce Currently Testing Dolibarr 18.0.4 and Glpi modules


@chrkli i was not aware you had attempted to work on a vaultwarden App, here NS8 module template fails on creating repository - Bug - NethServer Community

if youre open to a collab, I would be happy to engage

1 Like

@alefattorini could you kindly edit the first post to a wiki post?

EDIT: Thank you, now i can update the content

Hi Martin, sure I am.
Glad to see that there really is any interest in Vaultwarden as NS8-module going further.

I’ve managed to recover my broken VM I’ve used last year and pushed some minor changes I do not understand myself anymore to my GitHub repository.
Edit: Workflow is broken, too. That was not my intention

As I’m neither a programmer nor had anything else than the ns8-kickstart I had quite a hard time to get to where I’ve left off last year. Thus it might be better to take your work as the base rather than my try - feel free to have a look.

Kind regards

Update your yarn lock file, its out of date thats why.

could someone help me figure out why i am getting the following error here

2024-03-08T23:29:05+03:00 [1:2fauth2:systemd] 2fauth-app.service: Ignoring invalid environment assignment '2FAUTH_IMAGE=docker.io/2fauth/2fauth:5.0.4': /home/2fauth2/.config/state/environment
2024-03-08T23:29:05+03:00 [1:2fauth2:systemd] 2fauth.service: Ignoring invalid environment assignment '2FAUTH_IMAGE=docker.io/2fauth/2fauth:5.0.4': /home/2fauth2/.config/state/environment
2024-03-08T23:29:05+03:00 [1:2fauth2:systemd] Stopping Podman 2fauth.service...
2024-03-08T23:29:05+03:00 [1:2fauth2:systemd] 2fauth.service: Ignoring invalid environment assignment '2FAUTH_IMAGE=docker.io/2fauth/2fauth:5.0.4': /home/2fauth2/.config/state/environment

In relation to this App geniusdynamics/ns8-2fa: NS8 App for 2FAuth https://docs.2fauth.app/ (github.com)

is it that its not permisible to have something like this