I would create a committee for 1 year. No elections, just discussions, raised hands and meritocracy. Just to start and see how it goes. Evertything more is overkill for me.
Generally the chairman gives his vote just in very complex situations. And I wouldn’t vote at all
We should be aware of this and we should take a look, as inspiration, at a good Council Charter like this
We can use open discussions here in the community and sometimes a realtime chat/conference reporting all the decisions taken.
It’s the worst case and paradoxically (at the contrary) in Nethesis my colleagues are sure that I will vote for the community