I’m not blocked by the number of members of the board. I like the idea of 50-50 from nethesis and the community, but the idea of 55% nethesis and 45% community doesn’t satisfy me. I would like the exact parity !
At the end if the board doesn’t agree on a consensus, probably it is already a failure state. If you want an umpair number of board member, I would propose that the advantage would be done to the community.
Concerning the chairman, I’m sorry but it is the board members who need to elect it, I agree it can be alessio, or someone else, however it is the board stuff and after the election , they will decide.
the election can not be for 6 months, at least for 1 year, and with the system I have in mind, individual can go to the election, you don’t go by a list. Of course a coherent team can be elected, but we must not block a guy if he want to go alone to the board. That is democracy.
the bad side that we are speaking, it is we need to create the legal framework of this. Probably it will be the job of the first board, write and decide how will be done the governance…once done the next election will be on the good rails