I am setting up a couple of Qemu / KVM VM sessions and would like to set-up reverse DNS zones.
I would like a option in Nethservers web interface to allow for creation of Master / Primary and Slave / Secondary DNS zones. Also I would like to be able add in-addr.arpa addresses.
As an example of what I am attempting, please view the following pages:
I think that in small midsize organizations the need to have a full featured DNS server (authoritative) was unnecessary, even in other platforms this is happening.
At the other side, in specific cases (but I think in bigger organizations or at least in a more articulated scenario) the administrator should have the chance to install a full featured DNS server module/package as well as the chance to easily configure what he needs through the GUI.
IMHO I think that NethServer fits better where there is no need of a full featured DNS server.
@sitz I tend to disagree with youâŚ
For example i do need a full DNS server (authoritative) as for example I host everything my own.
Also there are several cases that I know that need this. So the choice should remain to the Administrator/Manager if he will use full feature DNS or not.
It is better to have full DNS into NS instead of having to relay on other server to do just DNS (increeses the complexity of your infrastructure and number of boxes)
Hi Roberto,
I think that what Alessio sayed is ok, and as you have also suggested, each of us has different uses for NS.
This is what i like about this comunity! Everyone contributes with his ideas and it does not need to be the same but it is good
What i can say is that I like the ideea of Full DNS because in my case i need it . Below are two scenaryos where you need/do not need full DNS.
Hosting everything yourself will require full DNS server (external DNS, where you are your self hosting your domain and have to do reverse dns, with txt and sfp records)
a small server without internet visibility does not (internal mail server, or collaborative server or AD server)
a small existent LAN from min 3 to max 20 clients without a server where clients use email directly from their providers so I put NethServer to manage email inside the company (italian law expect commercial organizations save emails for 10 years) to improve email management and security of data backup.
same as above but with an old server (generically Linux server, Microsoft SBS 2003 or other) that need to be replaced with a new one
In both cases I ask to customerâs ISP to make these changes:
publish an A record such as mail.company.tld to NethServer static public IP A.B.C.D
change MX record with mail.company.tld
deactivate any kind of cache, antivirus or antispam filter to avoid third party interferences
where requested/needed set a txt/spf record
You may think:âOK you can host yourself everythingâ itâs right but Iâm not an ISP and I donât want to be it.
Hi Roberto, thanx for your coments this is going somwhere now
@AbsyntH, Michele i know what you say, but this will deafeat the scope of NS we can do a CLI session for all the services of NS that will make the web interface not needed anymore
So it seems that now we have 3 scenariosâŚ
1 Self hosted self provided DNS/ Email / etc where you will require just an IP and a TLD registration and do the rest yourself
2 Middle box that will act as a gateway/ proxy and retrieval of external emails but will not serve as email server (just a relay)
3 Only internal usage of the services with no exposure to real world of the internal servcices, and act a as a gateway/proxy for local LAN.
I propose that we expand each scenario and see where this leads (what has to be provisioned for each case etc ).
U doesnât have to fullfill your server by BIND , coz it is huge + isc-dhcpd. DNSMASQ it is the best ligthweight dhcp-dns server , use manual to config it! U are not a provider so U doesnât have to setup BIND on NS and to Glue U domain to NS IP, but if u need it, setup POWER DNS or BIND manually and Use U brain !