Why not combine the two? NethPit
NethPit = Nethserver + Cockpit
IMHO it is just the GUI management interface, nothing more nothing less. It is not a feature nor is it a special thing. Hence I concurr with @danb35, no new name required if at all. It has been the server manager for decades.
I agree and I stand with @LayLow, @danb35 and @robb.
It’s simply the “New Server Manager” or technically “NethServer Cockpit” .
From a developer perspective, it will be simply “Cockpit”.
Bear with me. It’s not a futile argument. Names are important for people that don’t know the project
It looks like that we can all agree on the “NethServer Cockpit”
Is it the new server-manager? Yes it is. Is it the new NethGui? Yes it is.
I don’t agree! Cockpit is the name of another software project.
nethserver-cockpit is the name of the RPM, and follows the usual naming scheme.
It’s just NethServer.
I agree with Dan (and I’ll fix the docs by adding the hyphen if necessary)
Ok, so your point is: this the new NethServer interface. Right?
And here we’re going to call “interface”?
How are you going to call it into the next release notes?
As said above, “The new Server Manager” …and remove “new” as soon as it becomes the official one.
@danb35 is it more correct to put the dash? (i.e. Server-Manager?)
With SME it was always (AFAIK) called the server-manager, since that’s the URL you’d use to reach it. With Neth I’ve more often seen it called the server manager (without the dash). I don’t know that one is better than the other.