flatspin
(Ralf Jeckel)
November 13, 2017, 4:41pm
1
It’s possible to create a filter and than a profile with the same name in ufdb-guard. If you do so, the filter disappears which results in a complete unfiltered system.
If you create a filter like this:
and than create a profile like this:
the filter you specified before disappears after a “F5”
There is no warning and no hint about this in the manual.
The result is that no filter is choosen for this category and so the category is completely unfiltered.
If you do it the other way (first create a profile and than create the time), you get a failure:
If possible, this check should be done in both directions.
BTW: It would be very fine if the specified times in ufdb-guard could be displayed like this:
1 Like
giacomo
(Giacomo Sanchietti)
November 15, 2017, 8:35am
2
Thank you Ralf for reporting it, I just opened a new issue:
opened 08:32AM - 15 Nov 17 UTC
closed 04:22PM - 16 Nov 17 UTC
bug
verified
It's possible to create a filter and than a profile with the same name in ufdb-g… uard.
**Steps to reproduce**
- Go to the "Web content filter page"
- Create a filter with name "t1"
- Create a profile with the same name
**Expected behavior**
Creation of the new profile must fail.
**Actual behavior**
Creation of the new profile doesn't file and the web filter doesn't have a functional configuration.
**Components**
nethserver-squidguard-1.7.3-1.ns7.noarch
**See also**
https://community.nethserver.org/t/its-possible-to-create-a-filter-and-a-profile-with-the-same-name-in-ufdb-guard/8281
----
Thanks to @nsflatspin
I will let you know as soon as a new testing package is available.
Edit
Just added the RPM to testing repository (nethserver-squidguard-1.7.3-1.1.gc319438.ns7.noarch.rpm).
Would you like to try it and test it?
giacomo
(Giacomo Sanchietti)
November 16, 2017, 2:34pm
3
@flatspin please, give it a try!
flatspin
(Ralf Jeckel)
November 16, 2017, 3:29pm
5
Installed:
works correctly in “Profiles”, “Filters” and “Times” and vice versa
Great work as usual my friend and almost with speed of light!
Thanks a lot.
giacomo
(Giacomo Sanchietti)
November 16, 2017, 4:22pm
6
The fix was pretty easy, you did all the analytic job!
Released!