I’m waiting
Done!
I’m a brand new github user…but when I try to login into the dokuwiki a get a 404 error (page not found) with github as well with google+
I cannot see you in the database of users
ok, the url move broke up the github authentication, will do it ASAP
OK but if you want I can register within internal dokuwiki user database.
Oauth is back again for github and google, for internal authentication you can use the register link
OK I’m in!
Thanks @stephdl
I was looking this page
http://wiki.nethserver.org/doku.php?id=developer
And I ask myself: Can we put variuos tags on a how to?
Actualy all is in the same melpot.
I would suggest to make section for this develloper page: environment ( set up the environment, repository), e-smith, netgui, rpm.
What is your opinion about this?
The same observation for this page:
http://wiki.nethserver.org/doku.php?id=howto_s
The howto create howto is on the middle of all.
I would suggest a special section to place this one a the first and separation how to.
And create section to organize as coresystem, application. If possible to organize as general audience, intermediate and advanced,
You can use several tags when you declare a category at the end of your wiki page, see http://wiki.nethserver.org/doku.php?id=howto:wiki_help#tag_plugin
when you search a page you have two possibilities, at least this is how I do
- with the search box in the top, it is really powerfull…I use it often
- with the category filter of the left menu http://wiki.nethserver.org/doku.php?id=category but indeed it asks to have several tags/categories.
I don’t know if we need to do other pages for each category, from my experience the http://wiki.nethserver.org/doku.php?id=category should be enough.
I suppose that for the beginning we can look after the category page and find a good (some) relevant tag(s) for your content…if it doesn’t exist, then you must determine what is/are the best tag(s) for the page you are writing.
the category page will list all tags with at least one page, it is automatic.
I agree and sustain your point. It will be necessary to add more tags for the how-to’s.
BR
Bogdan
Don’t misunderstand me, I don’t want more pages per categories.
One page is good, but more section or chapter to be clear and more structured
then somewhere in a page add :
{{topic>Tag1}}
and you will retrieve all page tagged with Tag1
Actually in the tag ‘developer’ I made two subcategories ‘rpm’ and ‘git’, but indeed I should do and third category ‘esmith’ for all ‘perldoc’ I did.
done
another way if you want to list all tags in another page (without created it) → see developer:rpm_documentation [NethServer Wiki]
look → we hold some documentations on the wiki, see the git category
look → We hold some documentations on our wiki, browse the rpm category
add {{tagpage>TagName}}
IMHO at the moment the tags will do the job but if we have much more Howto’s it will be difficult to find the right one. As I mentioned before
If we have more Howto’s I suggest to categorise it to get a structure in as @Jim mentioned it.
I just looked at howto’s section in the wiki… excellent BUT howtos MUST be NS compliant…
please, read:
http://wiki.nethserver.org/doku.php?id=howto:how_to_make_nethserver_os_x_friendly_-avahi
and
http://wiki.nethserver.org/doku.php?id=howto:how_to_make_nethserver_os_x_friendly-_afp
there are (way too) many problems:
- direct editing of conf file
- no template/fragments creation
- development tools installation on the server
- no warning about the risks of doing so
- no suggestion to use a different/test server to compile packages
- no warning about compiling rpms using external (unknown) sources
- use of rpm instead of yum (for dependencies solving)
let me point out that I don’t expect people knows everything about NS’ internals since the beginning, but some rules must be used…
- everything that is not NS compliant should be evidenced
- everything that can reduce security must be evidenced
otherwise, we could have some compromised/broken server just following an “official” howto, and that’s no good at all
as usual, my 2c
As always: feel free to adjust documentation or send recommendations for adjustment.
Often documentation is WIP (work in progress). It often needs additional work and proofreading. Since the wiki does not have a ‘staging’ area, this must be done in the wiki itself.
Believe or not, I was thinking about this.
Actually I not satisfied with developer tools on the server.
I was Imagining to make this procedure in a VM and at the end put the rpm on the server to install it.
Thank you for your suggestion, and for the interrest to enhance the existing stuff
@stephdl
In the dokuwiki is on the left side the links: Discoursee which links to the community. Why did you name it as “Discourse” and not as “Community”? Normally Community is used as a reference and to use Discourse create confusion IMHO.
I support this suggestion, I always tried to name this place “Community” because what matters here are people not the tool used.
done…