Roadmap for Q1 2016

Not only Enterprises need AD. Schools also need a platform independent user management solution. And AD (through Samba4) is a decent option for this. And the more user accounts, the more you need it. I would start using this from 15 users and more, or something like that.

Samba4 is perfectly capable to add any (linux, windows and OSX) platform. Have a look at the implementation at Karoshi Linux (www.linuxschools.com) Through a bash script Samba gets pre provisioned. For a school this is a very nice feature but also can be left out. Maybe NS can copy some of the provisioning scripts from Karoshi Linux.

Sure, I agree Samba and AD could deal with Mac Os and Linux.
But for a Small business (i smaller than 10 computers ) is it worth to implement It.

Or the ā€œtraditionalā€ way is simpler and better?

If the implementation is like 1 mouseclick away, then it should not be a problem. It can have a lot of advantages even in small environments.

In Samba4 and Windows AD there is no primairy domain controller. All DC’s can add and change useraccounts. With the old (WinNT and Samba3) accounting system, accounts can only added and changed on the PDC.

But it’s one solution between other. It can be a stategy.

It’s another possibility…

nobody has THE solution… Each enterprise, each activity has it’s own need and it’s own solution.
Don’t restrict the way to use, offer a backup link, it’s only ONE way to do… There others ways, others possibility to offer :wink:

Jim: MX is a DNS record, usally managed by your ISP, so NS is not involved…

now, is it clear that talking about MX backup is quite useless?
then, almost all mail servers (mta) are able to store in the queue mails that can’t be delivered because of issues on recipient’s side… that said, you’re just looking for complications :wink:

1 Like

Most registrars offer a backup MX solution out of the box. It stores mail when your own mailserver is down. There for the backup MX has a lower priority to handle delivery of new mail and will all mail always be delivered at your mailserver and not the backup MX of the registrar.

The backup Mx is a RFC, is perfectlly defined:

A target server, i.e. one that knows how to deliver to the relevant user’s e-mail mailbox is typically one which is the most preferred. Lower priority servers, a.k.a. backup MX or secondary MX, usually keep the messages in a queue waiting for the primary server to become available. If both servers are online or in some way connected to one another, the backup MX will typically queue a message briefly and immediately forward it to the primary MX. The backup MX acts as a store and forward mail server.

I would prefer Nethserver integrate this and let the user ( the sysadmin ) choose how he will use it… Choose the resilience he need.

Perhpas, you never face a ā€œsale forceā€ that can’t connect to her mailbox when she absolutly need :grin:

Sorry, but I don’t understand very well what do you want to say.

@zamboni has totally right.

MX is a DNS record, usually made on an authoritative Name Server (primary). If you want a backup for MX you need an another NS (secondary). THE MX RECORD DON’T KEEP THE EMAILS! Only show where the email server (mta) is located!

If you want a backup for the mail server (mta), of course you will need an another email server (mta).

When I’m wrong, I admit it.

And when I’n not sure, I verify:

Perhaps I’m not explain very well…Sorry.
When I talk multi-site…it’s two servers. One on each site to offer resilience.
I’m talking about two mailservers.

Edit: and it can be multi-domain, one domain be a backup of the second…

1 Like