I have a problem with nethserver if I test the line with a laptop it marks me 85mb download and 65mb upload
if instead I do the test passing through the firewall it marks me in download 85mb and in upload, sometimes 3-4mb other 7mb the maximum that arrived was about 22mb.
I tried to disable the various services one by one but I found no benefit … any ideas?
Where is the Speedtest feature available?. The Speedtest feature seems to have been removed or moved.
Also, the Applications > Firewall > Settings > WAN page now has the ability to pick Active-backup or balance. In Active-backup mode, the display of upload/download bandwidth seems less useful than the time graph that appears under charts when balance mode is enabled. But charts seems to have reintroduced an old minor bug, where speed is labeled KB, which is the convention for BYTES per second instead of Kb for bits per second.
An old confusion when to use bits, when to use bytes.
→ Bits is used in transfer, eg over the wire, wireless, etc.
→ Bytes is used for storage, eg Diskspace, USB, and so on.
It’s simple, but there is still confusion about it!
As such, a Speedtest MUST use a bits denominated measure, be it kb/s, mb/s gb/s or whatever.
A speedtest for the USB-C speed would also be given in Bits (Gigabits nowadays), whereas the storage capacity would be given in Bytes (Gigabytes nowadays).
Then again, there also programmers using (suffering from) an autocorrect capable system…
Wrote kilobits, system changed it to kilobytes, but no one actually “realized” the error. Your eyes correct such errors, without registering them…
@Andy_Wismer I was not confused, but always happy to have people add value to a discussion Her is a tiny bug. The Firewall > Traffic Shaping, (sorry about incorrectly saying it was on the WAN page) the display uses a B as in Bytes instead of a b as in bits.
Giacomo, I concede this is a minor point, but with respect to your claim it looks correct to you, see the peak transfer rate on my chart. It shows about 292MB. That would mean that my internet connection would be operating at about 3 Gigabits per second download, and . That is not possible.Further, the upload speed of about 18 Gigabytes per second is 10 times what I measure from my desktop.
A bit more detail: I tried I have actually seen throughput through my little fanless i7 CPU box of 1Gbps using Speedtest from my desktop and from the former Speedtest feature in Nethserver. People had expressed caution about the perfomance of the built-in RealTek NICs, and the i7 CPU, but when I ran those tests, the CPU usage was less than half on one core.
I had upgraded my Comcast service from 600 Mbps to 1Gigabit because most of the time, speeds were below 1Gigabit per second. Comcast did a mass improvement for this class of service from 600 Megabits per second download, and I consistently get 18 Megabits per second upload, versus Comcast’s advertised 15 Megabits per second best efforts for this class of service.
My bad, I didn’t understand the value was wrong, I thought it was only a about displaying the values in a different format.
This is my speedtest:
Retrieving speedtest.net configuration...
Testing from Telecom Italia Business (80.17.99.73)...
Retrieving speedtest.net server list...
Selecting best server based on ping...
Hosted by IRIDEOS SpA (Rome) [219.69 km]: 16.062 ms
Testing download speed................................................................................
Download: 79.35 Mbit/s
Testing upload speed......................................................................................................
Upload: 80.66 Mbit/s
It may be more of a rhetorical question, but Disk-IO is actually transfer, not storage, so here (most likely) small caps would be correct, but I’ll admit, here I’m really not sure…