Fixed:
I’d say hidden by default with progressive disclosure.
I think the dashboard page should be titled “Webtop 5 dashboard” or just webtop 5.
For naming style reference see the Web server or Firewall apps…
I noticed that some packages show Dashboard and some other the name of package. If you want I can open an improvement and change all to name of package.
Whatever is chosen, I think it is important to be consistent.
Yes in fact I can review all modules.
Opened the improvement:
@davidep I noticed also that some pages on some modules are <h1>
instead of <h2>
. Should I have to correct the tag in the same PRs on these pages or we can ignore that?
EDIT: I see that only modules with Dashboard wrong have also h1 tag. I fix also this.
@federico.ballarini … I think maybe SMTP STARTTLS
can be put in the advanced options
In most cases it is not necessary to enable this option since communication with the server takes place in localhost and can rarely be used.
@davidep I fixed the problem of dashboard name. You can see my development process into the issue #6004.
@lucag As you prefer: we can wait a feedback from @giacomo and @Amygos. But should we move under advanced settings section also SMTP Authentication?
I think not @federico.ballarini , unencrypted SMTP authentication is much more used in this case
We await other opinions.
IMO you can move all SMTP related option under advanced, most of the users doesn’t need to change it.
I do not even know why these options are needed
SMTP authentication is used to avoid outgoing email virus scanning problems in some cases
Hi all, welcome back!
What we want to do with SMTP options? I can finish development process and you can review the code.
Thanks
For now, just put it under advanced.
We will move it outside if many users are unable to find it
Great job @federico.ballarini
I suggest inserting placeholders with the default values in the “Public URL” and “DAV server URL” fields, automatically obtaining the FQDN of the server.
For example:
What do you think ?
Yes, good
Can you check also doc-inline and labels? Then I will commit changes.
I checked and it seems to me that the labels and doc-inlines are already so good.
Excellent idea!
Wonderful team work!