Is there a document to explain the testing process?
Nope, we should write it down. Maybe our new Testing Team could help with it, right?
I wrote something here: Dashboard link status always OK? - #8 by alefattorini
vcc
(Vasco)
May 8, 2015, 6:10pm
16
Already tested and reported to Giacomo
medworthy
(Mark Edworthy)
May 8, 2015, 6:17pm
17
I would like to help, but would like to view a roadmap / projected development schedule and / or testing - QA procedure documentation.
1 Like
@giacomo will try to keep you updated on this.
Take a look at some details here:
Just to share a very short-term roadmap.
These things will be released in next few days:
Some tweaks for Squid (like a configurable list of safe ports)
Minor firewall optimizations
SNMP server support
We are working on:
support for ip range and subnet objects for firewall rules
support for ip range subnet, role and zones in web content filter
ip/mac binding in firewall
language packs
Want share with you this short/long term roadmap.
We will continue to update this as we encounter more “yes, we’re probably going to do that, but I can’t tell you exactly when” feature requests.
Short-Term (aka next months)
Radius Server
Adagios + OCSInventory + Nagios
FreePBX-Asterisk
New groupware based on WebTop project
NethServer 7 alpha
Long Term (aka hope within this year)
FreeIPA
medworthy:
I would like to help
You’re welcome, just added you to the team.
Please, get start from this http://dev.nethserver.org/projects/nethserver/issues?query_id=27
Let’s choose an issue and follow test cases!
Woah, a lot of work here!!
@vcc you’re a great Testing Team coordinator! Take a look at this guy!
http://dev.nethserver.org/issues/3165#change-15243
http://dev.nethserver.org/issues/3164#change-15242
http://dev.nethserver.org/issues/3158#change-15173
Please write a simple document to explain the testing process as suggested above!
alefattorini
(Alessio Fattorini)
Split this topic
June 17, 2015, 11:32am
23
@mabeleira , @fasttech , @medworthy , @vcc , @dz00te
what do think to write togheter “How to make QA”
We should write down guidelines, hints, best practices. This could be a good starting point:
If others testing team members are interested, i’m using this template for the verification process in redmine, i think it’s self-explanatory:
GENERAL WORKFLOW
1. status of test box and list of packages/groups currently installed
2. replicate problem in detail
3. install new package
4. repeat testing above (2nd line)
5. fixed/not fixed based on new testing, conclusion: VERIFIED or TRIAGED
6. Misc Notes (Documentation Impact, other..)
VERIFICATION TEMPLATE
+System and…
What about?
2 Likes
mabeleira
(Jose "Martin" Abeleira. AKA Marto)
July 9, 2015, 3:28pm
25
i’ll try to write something this weekend
1 Like
dz00te
August 6, 2015, 5:43pm
27
hi @alefattorini
what do you think to create a subcategory qa/testing under the category development (like Translations)? it’s easier to select/search than with tags
Why not? Are there already some discussions about it?
dz00te
August 6, 2015, 6:22pm
29
if you mean about the creation of the category, i don’t think…
if you mean if there are discussion that can be moved inside the new category:
all in:
Topics tagged qa
some of:
Topics tagged testing
and others like:
If others testing team members are interested, i’m using this template for the verification process in redmine, i think it’s self-explanatory:
GENERAL WORKFLOW
1. status of test box and list of packages/groups currently installed
2. replicate problem in detail
3. install new package
4. repeat testing above (2nd line)
5. fixed/not fixed based on new testing, conclusion: VERIFIED or TRIAGED
6. Misc Notes (Documentation Impact, other..)
VERIFICATION TEMPLATE
+System and…
I can help in other tthings, like testing or trying new features.
maybe some others…
Yes they are, what do you think @davidep ? Should we add such category? We can call it just “Testing”
davidep
(Davide Principi)
August 7, 2015, 8:28am
31
great idea @dz00te
@alefattorini why don’t we have it yet!?
Are you sure?
This category is obsolete. For new topics add a testing tag instead. More info
@dz00te happy testing with your new category
1 Like